Friday, February 11, 2011

Five common problem in Chinese academic circles Guangqian

 One.
Lack of love the spirit of truth, Chinese scholars, most of them can not exceed the Academic research has most of the people because it has a practical, but gradually developed human thought, the new machine gradually Cheng Lu, curiosity even a single day instead of passing day, more than a practical philosophy of science goals, the road to seek the truth to go. the truth is certainly useful, but even useless, scientists philosophers and never will so do-eat the bread of idleness. Precision speaking, curiosity and knowledge of human nature. dressing dinner for the satiation of the natural requirements, seeking truth and nothing but the academic nature of the requirements for the satiation. Who can say This has practical, that there is no practical? If we want to contribute to scholarship, we must cultivate love of the truth as early as possible the spirit of pragmatism in the second layer.
II. the lack of scientific criticism of the spirit of the
The second drawback is that blind obedience to arbitrary, non-critical spirit, it is probably my previous field of doctrine, thought it must be right, others debate with him, he was just old-fashioned, turned a deaf ear. This is no criticism of their own spirit. have always believed others jumped on the bandwagon, the latest fashion. This is no criticism of others too spirit. arbitrary and blind obedience, and because there is no spirit of criticism, is the academic cut out heart worm. We should fight with the evil root.
that we do not have the spirit of criticism, not to say that we do not criticize, we good gossip, but not the spirit of scientific criticism, often guilty of making errors in logic. The most common mistake is to make a false claim, do not give reasons; or reason, although held not to find a few examples to prove this argument .
absurd and a wrong committed in China is the largest, is beside the point attack. They see the incompatibility doctrine and private, not elegant to the very clear, with calm reason has not been criticized, and who first advocated the doctrine of Wuqibazao the swear about it, have a good laugh at him a little something. Features some people become cynical. These people, some because of mental weakness, and some because of deliberate bloom, to compete with rivals. bloom are certainly not to force people who made him bloom blame. them a violation of truth, a cause contrary to the truth, the truth also harming.
truth is a peaceful world, which no race, no boundaries, no doors, no prejudice to the go to all the world is a friend.
III. the lack of loyalty to the spirit of solid
to know the fuse, I do not know if that false knowledge, know no longer be objective. to another person that, in order to know the knowledge, if others believe in me, it caused repeated the baseless assertion. in front of self-deception, followed deceptive. self-deception is wrong since the error people. so scientists advocating a theory, often life-long effort to think carefully observe the experiment. until he is very thorough, that is very reliable, and only then study the results made public. This is the true scholar!
published scholars in China now the heat is too crazy. Many people in the next academic no real skill to write books to phony. there are some people, an academic he is not very thorough introduction to the cause to hearsay.
faithful to the spirit of the the other hand, is not plagiarism. is my invention, dare to say that I have invented; is not my invention and should not be swept beauty of people. Now our work is of a few percent of their original it? percent several stated his basis? hero can see, sometimes with unexpected. but in this over time, the trick is a lot of academic mistaken identity. this matter from the surface, it seems that the academic does not have evil effects, but the anatomy psychological, plagiarism because love really is too shallow, too much vanity. Both the spirit of academic psychology and research the fundamental conflict, we decided to get rid of this habit and strive to be faithful to the work.
IV. the lack of independent creative spirit < br> imitation heat than create heat, but also the great crisis of our academic community. imitate the original is not very bad, but one day if you want to progress in the academic day, there must be imitating you further to create it. Now we are beginning to imitate by the creation of come. If only Conservative, no new creation, future environmental change, we do not have new knowledge and the ability to adapt will be eliminated. We accounted for a quarter of humanity, have a larger responsibility than some other nations, we eyes closed, holding the arm of course not completely go along with others.
way to ingratiate oneself winds, the original is not without one-sided interests. but one hand to absorb the energy, the development of a variety of academic does not mean that the kind of Domination The knowledge is thus no It created a spirit gradually been eroded to go. Warring States over two thousand years after the academic progress of slow because of this heat over to imitate and create heat. Now we ask ourselves heard, precision. faster development of modern science, because of two reasons. First, to the attitude that the total power of subjective and objective gradually; two words on the way, to test and gradually forces accounted for more than fantasy. It can not be separated in fact for two reasons, although its focus on objective, it is still to discern. objective than subjective, may prove more than fantasy, more effective, because the subjective and utopian illusion that stereotypes are often easy to mistake, to test and thought the one hand, can supply material, one can correct thinking errors, so the result is true precision. So all of modern science to test and heavier.
our future life also when the occasional off the book, so the paper from the pile of people climb the world breathe a little fresh air!

No comments:

Post a Comment